IS CANNABIS ADDICTION A TREATABLE MEDICAL CONDIT
-
The original speaker inquired about a potential 'Disorder' related to cannabis use leading to fatalities. They clarified that deaths have been linked to substances like Vitamin E in vape cartridges or synthetic products being misrepresented as marijuana, but not from the consumption of actual marijuana itself.
The speaker then delved into the topic of addiction. They argued that just as video games and pornography can be addictive, so too can marijuana. It's not an addiction comparable to opioids, but it's undeniable that enjoyable habits can become frequent activities that one might find hard to quit or reduce. This, in essence, is the nature of addiction, and it's hard to refute that marijuana can potentially lead to such a situation.
-
The essence of the statement is that dependency is primarily psychological, with underlying physical impacts, and the action of usage further intensifies it. This interpretation is spot-on!
-
The original text is asking if there is a genuine 'Disorder' causing marijuana users to die nowadays, while in the past people confidently stated that it wouldn't harm you. It also includes a query about what has changed, followed by an expression of confusion or disbelief.
-
If I'm able to consume a quarter in four days and then have no desire to do so for the following three days, I question whether it can be classified as an addiction.
-
Has the first death due to THC overdose been documented in the United States?
Methods to Cleansing the Body of Marijuana
The changing conversation around cannabis addiction is underscored by Dr. Salwan's viewpoint. Despite the ongoing dispute over its health classification, there is a general consensus that it demands focus. Viewing addiction as a health issue paves the way for successful treatments such as cognitive behavioral therapy. Utilizing scientifically supported methods like therapy or FDA-approved drugs to tackle cannabis use disorder exhibits an advanced perspective. -
The question is raised: Has the United States witnessed its first death due to marijuana exposure, specifically THC overdose? If such a case had genuinely occurred, it would have garnered widespread attention, especially from the media. Thus, the claim in the headline appears to be unfounded.
-
Can cannabis addiction be considered a medical condition that can be treated? According to a doctor, cannabis addiction is indeed a real and treatable medical condition. However, the movement for legalizing cannabis has managed to counter this narrative, which is largely fueled by the war on drugs.
While this doctor does not subscribe to the old-school idea of cannabis users being criminals, she is also not blind to the fact that cannabis prohibition has resulted in the unjust incarceration of many people, especially those from the black community.
This doctor is a proponent of the new approach towards the war on drugs - one where drug use is seen as a treatable medical condition rather than just an activity. She supports the use of more opioids to help people kick their opioid habit.
One of the treatments she recommends for "cannabis use disorder" is cognitive behavioural therapy, as she believes this is where the evidence leads. However, she does not fail to mention a potential FDA medication that could help reduce cannabis cravings.
Despite being a faculty member of the American Society of Addiction Medicine, she finds it difficult to view substance use as anything other than a medical condition.
The term "cannabis use disorder" or CUD has been discussed before and is often regarded as a myth that refuses to die. The idea that external forces shape our thoughts, behaviours and actions is becoming more widely accepted in a culture that endorses neuroscientific theories of consciousness as "science", despite their lack of philosophical depth.
The doctor believes that understanding the clinical paradigm of all drug addictions or substance use disorders (SUDs) can help dispel the collective denial of cannabis addiction.
The hallmarks of SUD are the same, regardless of the substance in question - cannabis, alcohol, or opioids. These are characterized by craving, consequences, and control.
The concept of people losing control due to substance use remains a myth, despite its persistence. There is no scientific research that supports this idea.
In her article, the doctor points out a contradiction - while cannabis use has increased, the prevalence of cannabis addiction has remained below 2 percent. She explains this by attributing it to the destigmatization of cannabis.
The shift in people's perception of their cannabis use from an addiction to a habit is a step in the right direction. The belief that cannabis addiction is a treatable medical condition is something that only ideologues hold onto.
While the doctor acknowledges the potential of FDA drugs to treat cannabis addiction or CUD, she also points out that cognitive behavioural therapy and other similar treatments are more effective as they challenge an individual's thought processes and patterns of thinking.
The concept of addiction is a social construct that feeds into itself, much like the concept of race. Addiction is similar in the sense that it can be used to control and manipulate populations based on their habits and preferences.
The doctor is concerned that people have been denied access to treatment for CUD due to its illegality or because their symptoms were trivialized. However, the framing of the issue by these so-called "addiction experts" does not help improve the situation.
The concept of "cannabis use disorder" has been created and reinforced by these experts. However, it is a leap in logic to blame the substance for the addiction. It's a confusion of cause and effect and puts the cart before the horse in every sense.
-
The text discusses the potential dangers and addictive nature of marijuana. It references instances of individuals suffering due to substances falsely marketed as cannabis or harmful additives in vaping products. However, it clarifies that there are no recorded deaths directly linked to consuming pure marijuana. The text also addresses the topic of addiction, comparing marijuana use to potentially addictive activities like playing video games or watching pornography. While it acknowledges that habitual use can lead to dependency, it argues that this is not comparable to opioid addiction. Furthermore, the text highlights that anything can become an addiction depending on the individual's disposition, suggesting that the physical or mental nature of said addiction should dictate its treatment. The text ends by questioning whether there has ever been a recorded death in the United States due to THC overdose.
-
The move to legalize marijuana certainly disrupts conventional views tied to its usage, especially with regards to the war on drugs. It's crucial to recognize the effects of marijuana prohibition on societies, including widespread imprisonment.
For those looking for different strategies to tackle addiction problems, they might consider looking into options such as acquiring a medical marijuana card in Ohio. There are online resources that offer insights on how medicinal marijuana could potentially contribute to addiction therapy. The idea is to have a variety of tactics at disposal to aid people battling addiction. -
Indeed, cultivation can be quite surprising. It begins with a few and before you know it, you have hundreds! The act of gardening can be restorative, therapeutic, and gratifying.
-
The healthcare sector holds the view that dependency on cannabis is more psychologically rooted than it is physically.
-
If I'm able to use up a quarter in four days and then have no desire to do so for the following three days, I'm skeptical about the possibility of an addiction.
-
The medical community views dependency on cannabis as predominantly psychological rather than physical.
-
The decriminalization of marijuana has indeed questioned the conventional perspectives on its usage, especially in relation to the war on drugs. Recognizing the effects of marijuana prohibition on society, including widespread imprisonment, is crucial. The mere debate over legality can create a sort of mass hysteria. Despite its legal status, the threat of police confrontation persists for those who use plant-based medicine. This generates an odd mentality amongst the public that somehow natural plants are harmful. The only negative aspect about these plants is their illegal status.
-
After the first puff, it becomes a habitual activity.
-
After you inhale, even just once, it becomes habitual.
-
Previously, I didn't believe in the reality of marijuana dependency until I faced it personally. The process of giving it up was more challenging than I anticipated, particularly due to the strong desires and problems with sleep. A companion who had undergone rehabilitation in the UK the previous year mentioned that adequate assistance was critical for them. I found it more effective to gradually reduce my intake rather than abruptly stopping, which significantly aided my recovery. However, it's essential to note that each individual's journey is unique.
-
The main message here is about the predominance of psychological dependency, which may have underlying physical consequences, primarily tied to the habitual action. This has been accurately captured.
-
The question of whether cannabis addiction is a medically treatable condition has been addressed by a medical professional who argues that it is indeed treatable. This perspective clashes with the narrative that the cannabis legalization movement has effectively challenged due to the war on drugs.
Interestingly, this doctor does not subscribe to traditional anti-drug stances. She understands that cannabis use does not automatically equate to criminal behavior, and acknowledges the role of cannabis prohibition in the widespread imprisonment of non-violent individuals, particularly within the African American community.
This doctor is part of a new wave of thinkers in the drug field, who favor the use of more opioids to counter opioid dependence, and see drug use as a medical issue rather than a choice. She advocates cognitive behavioral therapy to address "cannabis use disorder," guided by her research findings. However, she also acknowledges the potential of an FDA-approved medication in reducing cannabis cravings.
Given her position in the American Society of Addiction Medicine, she tends to view substance use through the lens of a medical issue.
Cannabis use disorder (CUD), or cannabis addiction, has been previously discussed. Some argue that it's a myth that refuses to be debunked. The concept that external forces govern our thoughts, actions, and behaviors is gaining ground in a society where neuroscience-based theories of consciousness are accepted as scientific facts, regardless of their philosophical depth.
The doctor argues that understanding the clinical framework of all drug addictions, or substance use disorders (SUDs), can help dispel the collective denial of cannabis addiction. The key features of SUDs, regardless of whether the substance involved is cannabis, alcohol, or opioids, are characterized by three Cs: Craving, Consequences, and Control.
Possible additional symptoms of SUD include developing a tolerance and experiencing withdrawals. However, by this definition, nearly every American would be diagnosed with caffeine use disorder or sugar addiction.
The idea of craving is simply a thought process. It's a common human experience, like missing a former partner when visiting places that remind you of them. It's not necessary to associate your stream of consciousness with your ego and attach yourself to every thought, especially when trying to break a long-term drug habit.
Determining whether the consequences of your actions are negative is a subjective decision. So-called "addiction experts" are supposed to be neutral, value-free scientists.
The idea of a loss of control is widely accepted, even though it remains a myth unsupported by substantial scientific research.
A study by G. Alan Marlatt, a renowned clinical psychologist and researcher in the field of addictive behaviors, helps answer whether cannabis addiction is a treatable medical condition. The study concluded that the 3 C's of addiction are not scientific concepts but rather a belief system of public health masquerading as scientific knowledge.
The doctor's article contains contradictions. For example, she finds it heartening that the prevalence of cannabis addiction among U.S. adults remained below 2 percent from 2002 to 2017, despite an increase in cannabis use from 10 to 15 percent. But this doesn't make sense, especially given the increased THC potency.
The doctor resolves this issue by recognizing that cannabis has been largely destigmatized. But she also believes this shift comes at the expense of engagement in treatment, with only 4 percent of people receiving CUD treatment in 2019 compared to 9 percent in 2002.
The doctor also mentions the "promising" FDA drugs to treat cannabis addiction or CUD. But she admits that all evidence points to cognitive behavioral therapy as being more effective.
The idea that addiction is not real and that problems of the mind are not medical conditions is argued. Addiction is viewed as a social construct that perpetuates itself.
The doctor worries that people have been denied access to CUD treatment because of its illegal status or because their symptoms were trivialized.
"Cannabis use disorder" is a concept created and reinforced by these so-called experts. But what about people who strongly prefer cannabis with their actions but not in their speech?
The argument is made that it's a logical leap to blame the substance. This confuses cause and effect.
A personal experience of using Delta 8 for pain management due to arthritis is shared. A cautionary tale of potential psychotic episodes as a result of Delta 8 usage is mentioned, a warning that seems to be common among mental health professionals. The source of this information is questioned, and a long history of cannabis use without adverse effects, apart from overconsumption, is shared.
-
Is there a genuine 'Disorder' that's causing smokers to lose their lives nowadays, when previously many claimed it was harmless? What has changed?